"at the meeting on 2 Jan" vs "at the meeting held on 2 Jan"

Question

"at the meeting on 2 Jan" vs "at the meeting held on 2 Jan"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'At the meeting on 2 Jan' is a more concise way of indicating the date of the meeting, while 'At the meeting held on 2 Jan' provides more emphasis on the fact that the meeting took place on that specific date.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is a concise way of specifying the date of a meeting. It is commonly used in informal and formal contexts.

Examples:

I will see you at the meeting on 2 Jan.
The decision was made at the meeting on 2 Jan.

Alternatives:

at the meeting on January 2nd
at the meeting on the 2nd of January

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the meeting actually occurred on the specified date. It is suitable for more formal contexts.

Examples:

The decisions made at the meeting held on 2 Jan were crucial.
I attended the meeting held on 2 Jan.

Alternatives:

at the meeting that took place on 2 Jan
at the meeting that occurred on 2 Jan

Answer 1

at the meeting on 2 Jan

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate the date of a meeting.

Answer 2

at the meeting held on 2 Jan

This phrase is correct and emphasizes that the meeting took place on a specific date.

"at the meeting on 2 Jan" vs "at the meeting held on 2 Jan"

at the meeting on 2 Jan

at the meeting held on 2 Jan

Related Comparisons