at CI=95% vs at the CI=95%

Both phrases are not correct as they are missing a key element. The correct phrase should be 'at the 95% confidence interval'. It is important to include 'confidence interval' after the percentage value to make the phrase grammatically correct and clear.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 773 views

This phrase is not correct as it is missing the article 'the' before 'ci' and the term 'confidence interval' after '95%'.

"at CI=95% "

The correct phrase should be 'at the 95% confidence interval'.

Show examples from the web [+]

Jun 17, 2015 ... ... CMAC, overall endotracheal intubation success by a critical care transport practitioner increased from 94.9% to 99.0% (significant at CI 95%, ...
Mar 27, 2012 ... ... curve of 0.781 for TAT (CI 95% 0.68-0.86) compared to 0.709 for peak VO2 (CI 95% 0.60-0.80) and 0.625 for VO2 at AT (CI 95% 0.51-0.72).
from 1989 – 2010; R2 = 0.003, p = 0.79 fails t-test at CI = 95%. (C) Mean winter Toolik LTER SAT 1 m 1989 – 2010; R2 = 0.013, p = 0.61 fails t-test at CI = 95%.
taken from Table 3. Although the number of proteins quan- tified with a CV , 0.5 before and after outlier exclusion changes (396 at CI . 95%before and 408 at CI .

Alternatives:

at the 95% confidence interval

This phrase is also not correct as it is missing the term 'confidence interval' after '95%'.

"at the CI=95% "

The correct phrase should be 'at the 95% confidence interval'.

Show examples from the web [+]

Protein Scores (MS data) and Ion Scores (MS/MS data) above the Significance Level are considered to be statistically non-random at the C.I. 95%. You can ...
The MDD at the CI95% for the 6MWT was 32.4 meters. The MCID for the 6MWT was 30.1 (CI95% 20.8, 39.4) meters. The MDD for daily activity was 5,909 vector ...
Dec 18, 2005 ... Therefore, based on analyses of representative data, the BLM determined at the CI=95% that no significant individual or cumulative impact to ...

Alternatives:

at the 95% confidence interval

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

at CI=95% vs at the CI=95%

"at CI=95% "

"at the CI=95% "

Related Comparisons