"assume the role" vs "assumed the role"

Question

"assume the role" vs "assumed the role"

Both "assumed the role" and "assume the role" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Assumed the role" is used to describe someone who has taken on a role in the past, while "assume the role" is used to talk about someone taking on a role in the present or future.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to describe someone taking on a specific role or position in the present or future. It indicates that the person is currently or will be in that role.

Examples:

She will assume the role of project manager starting next month.
They assume the role of mentors for new employees.

Alternatives:

take on the role
step into the role
accept the role
embrace the role
fill the role

This phrase is used to talk about someone who has already taken on a specific role or position in the past. It indicates that the person is no longer in that role.

Examples:

He assumed the role of CEO after the previous one resigned.
She assumed the role of team captain for the championship game.

Alternatives:

took on the role
stepped into the role
accepted the role
embraced the role
filled the role

Answer 1

assume the role

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to talk about someone taking on a role in the present or future.

Answer 2

assumed the role

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe someone who has taken on a role in the past.

"assume the role" vs "assumed the role"

assume the role

assumed the role

Related Comparisons