"arrival in" vs "arrival to"

Question

"arrival in" vs "arrival to"

Both 'arrival to' and 'arrival in' are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. 'Arrival to' is used when referring to the destination or place where someone or something arrives, while 'arrival in' is used when referring to the location or country where someone or something arrives.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

Use 'arrival in' when indicating the location or country where someone or something arrives. For example, 'The travelers had an arrival in Paris yesterday.'

Examples:

The flight had an arrival in Tokyo.
The package had an arrival in the United States.
The train had an arrival in the capital city.

Alternatives:

arrival at
arrival to
arrival for
arrival on

Use 'arrival to' when indicating the destination or place where someone or something arrives. For example, 'The flight from New York had an arrival to London at 3:00 PM.'

Examples:

The package had an arrival to the customer's house.
The train had an arrival to the final station.
The letter had an arrival to the recipient's office.

Alternatives:

arrival at
arrival in
arrival for
arrival on

Answer 1

arrival in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the location or country where someone or something arrives.

Answer 2

arrival to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the destination or place where someone or something arrives.

"arrival in" vs "arrival to"

arrival in

arrival to

Related Comparisons