"arguments need to be deepened" vs "arguments to deepen"

Question

"arguments need to be deepened" vs "arguments to deepen"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'Arguments need to be deepened' implies that the arguments themselves need to be made more profound or detailed. On the other hand, 'arguments to deepen' suggests that the purpose of the arguments is to deepen or enhance something else. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is used when emphasizing the need for arguments to be made more profound, detailed, or thorough.

Examples:

The discussion was interesting, but the arguments need to be deepened to truly understand the issue.
In order to convince the audience, the arguments need to be deepened with more evidence and examples.

Alternatives:

The arguments should be further developed.
The arguments need more depth.
The arguments require more elaboration.

This phrase is used when indicating that the purpose of the arguments is to deepen or enhance something else, such as understanding or insight.

Examples:

We presented these arguments to deepen our understanding of the issue.
The purpose of these arguments is to deepen the discussion and provide new perspectives.

Alternatives:

Arguments for deepening
Arguments aimed at deepening
Arguments intended to deepen

Answer 1

arguments need to be deepened

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

arguments to deepen

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"arguments need to be deepened" vs "arguments to deepen"

arguments need to be deepened

arguments to deepen

Related Comparisons