"are also well-known in the literature" vs "are also well-known in literature"

Question

"are also well-known in the literature" vs "are also well-known in literature"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Are also well-known in literature' is more general and can refer to any type of literature, while 'are also well-known in the literature' specifically refers to a particular body of literature. The choice between the two depends on whether you are referring to literature in general or a specific set of literary works.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about something that is well-known within a particular set of literary works or a specific field of literature.

Examples:

The Romantic poets are also well-known in the literature of the 19th century.
The novel's themes are also well-known in the literature of the Victorian era.

Alternatives:

are also well-known in literary works
are also well-known in the world of literature
are also well-known in literary texts
are also well-known in the realm of literature

This phrase is used when talking about something that is well-known in the broader context of literature, without specifying a particular body of work.

Examples:

Shakespeare's plays are also well-known in literature.
The themes of love and betrayal are also well-known in literature.

Alternatives:

are also well-known in the literary world
are also well-known in literary circles
are also well-known in the field of literature
are also well-known in literary works

Answer 1

are also well-known in the literature

This phrase is correct and is used when referring to a specific body of literature.

Answer 2

are also well-known in literature

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to the general concept of literature.

"are also well-known in the literature" vs "are also well-known in literature"

are also well-known in the literature

are also well-known in literature

Related Comparisons