applicants that have vs applicants with

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Applicants that have' is used when referring to applicants who possess certain qualities or experiences, while 'applicants with' is used when referring to applicants who have certain characteristics or qualifications.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 657 views

applicants that have

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to applicants who possess certain qualities or experiences.

This phrase is used to describe applicants who have specific attributes, skills, or experiences. It is often used in the context of job applications or admissions processes.

Examples:

Applicants that have previous work experience will be given priority.
We are looking for applicants that have a strong educational background.
The applicants that have demonstrated leadership skills will be shortlisted.

Show examples from the web [+]

All applicants that have replied to the survey were satisfied with the Fund.
Finally it should be noted that, despite the issues raised above, all applicants that have replied to the survey are satisfied with the Fund.
Applicants that have invested under the previous scheme should not be excluded.
Applicants that have invested in supporting the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I or in the authorisation of a biocidal product in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation
Except for applicants that have demonstrated language proficiency at an expert level (level six) in accordance with Annex III, the language endorsement shall be valid for a renewable period of:
Other applicants that have been issued with an export authorisation in 2005 should complete and submit the relevant form(s) according to the export substance(s) on the ODS website http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ods/index.htm in order to receive an Export Authorisation Number (EAN).
Applicants that have not been legally constituted in a Member State for at least two years, or fail to prove it, will be disqualified.

Alternatives:

applicants who have
applicants possessing
applicants holding
applicants exhibiting
applicants showing

applicants with

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to applicants who have certain characteristics or qualifications.

This phrase is used to describe applicants who possess specific characteristics, qualifications, or attributes. It is commonly used in job descriptions, recruitment processes, and selection criteria.

Examples:

Applicants with a degree in computer science are preferred.
We are seeking applicants with strong communication skills.
The company is looking for applicants with experience in marketing.

Show examples from the web [+]

In accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 18, applicants with special needs shall enjoy free legal assistance in all procedures provided for in this Directive.
In accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 18, applicants with special needs shall enjoy free legal assistance in all p rocedures provided for in this D irective.
Last year, seven applicants with a declared disability applied under our traineeship programme out of a total of 1296.
But in light of recent events, we're prioritising applicants with specialist skills, or independent means.
Applicants with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin shall be assessed as unfit.
Applicants with diplopia shall be assessed as unfit.
adopt measures to make recruitment procedures accessible to and inclusive of applicants with disabilities,
Subject: Recruitment of applicants with German as their first foreign language
For the applicants with a budgetary year that differs from the calendar year, the period of eligibility will be the 12-month period from the starting date of their budgetary year in 2008.
(aa) applicants with special needs, as defined in Article 2(d);
applicants with a large refractive error shall use contact lenses or high-index spectacle lenses;
Applicants with hypoacusis shall demonstrate satisfactory functional hearing ability.
Applicants with significant impairment of pulmonary function shall be assessed as unfit.
Applicants with prior experience as PIC may be credited towards the requirements in (a).
Applicants with prior experience as PIC on balloons may be credited towards the requirements in (a).
Applicants with a history or established diagnosis of:
Applicants with metabolic, nutritional or endocrine dysfunction may be assessed as fit subject to demonstrated stability of the condition and satisfactory aero-medical evaluation.
Applicants with diabetes mellitus not requiring insulin shall be assessed as unfit unless it can be demonstrated that blood sugar control has been achieved.
Applicants with a genitourinary disorder, such as:
Applicants with a psychiatric condition such as:

Alternatives:

applicants having
applicants possessing
applicants who have
applicants characterized by
applicants qualified by

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

applicants that have vs applicants with