TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

Applicants' resumes vs Applicant's resumes

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. 'Applicants' resumes' refers to the resumes of multiple applicants, while 'applicant's resumes' refers to the resumes of a single applicant. The choice between them depends on whether you are talking about one applicant or multiple applicants.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 2999 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"Applicants' resumes"

This phrase is used when referring to the resumes of multiple applicants. The possessive form 'applicants'' indicates that the resumes belong to more than one applicant.

Examples:

  • The HR department is reviewing the applicants' resumes.
  • Please submit all applicants' resumes by Friday.
  • The committee will evaluate the applicants' resumes before making a decision.
  • Driving examiners must be trained to assess correctly the applicants' ability to drive safely.
  • It is the applicants' responsibility to send their complete application by the deadline.
  • In the applicants' opinion this constitutes a procedural defect in violation of the Treaty.
  • In the applicants' opinion, that breaches the principle of individual responsibility.
  • These procedural failings harmed, in the applicants' view, their rights of defence.
  • Application for annulment of the applicants' pay slips for January 2009.
  • Applicants' rights unprotected as no procedural guarantees must be respected in the original text.
  • Applicants' rights unprotected as no procedural guarantees must be respected in the original text.
  • We always speak with applicants' families.
  • You can guess which 'applicant' was invited for interview.
  • Misinterpretation of the regulatory framework and of the applicants' related rights under directive 67/548/EEC.
  • In the applicants' view the Commission defined the geographical market incorrectly.
  • The appeal procedures should be amended to provide a better guarantee for applicants' rights.
  • The Court concluded that applicants' proceedings were not determined within a reasonable period of time.
  • The ECHR found that the applicants' appeal had not been examined fairly after adversarial process.
  • Finland: A complaint about the illegal limitation of the applicants' rights to fish in certain waters.
  • At that stage, the applicants' systems are not compared with each other.
  • Certain sub-criteria will be used to assess applicants' operational capacity.
  • Ltd, an exporting producer located in India ('the applicant').
  • The Commission shall ensure that applicants' attention is drawn to the fact that they cannot cumulate subsidies from different Community funds.

Alternatives:

  • resumes of the applicants
  • the resumes belonging to the applicants
  • the resumes submitted by the applicants
  • the applicants' CVs
  • the applicants' job applications

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"Applicant's resumes "

This phrase is used when referring to the resumes of a single applicant. The possessive form 'applicant's' indicates that the resumes belong to one applicant.

Examples:

  • The applicant's resumes were impressive.
  • Please review the applicant's resumes before the interview.
  • The company requested the applicant's resumes for further consideration.
  • order the CoR to resume, from the date of the future judgment, the transfer of part of the applicant's remuneration to France, with the correction coefficient applicable to that country;
  • Annulment of the applicant's appraisal report for 2008.
  • Unreasoned (or implicit) rejection of the applicant's request that witnesses be examined.
  • Finally, the contested decisions undermine the applicant's professional reputation and dignity.
  • According to the applicants, the Commission therefore violated the applicant's legitimate expectations.
  • The period of eligibility must correspond to the applicant's budget year.
  • Decision to remove the applicant's personal effects
  • In the applicant's submission, the regulation has no legal basis in Community law.
  • The European Parliament subsequently decided to waive the applicant's parliamentary immunity.
  • In the applicant's view, only the Commission's 1994 guidelines were applicable.
  • Tenth, the applicant's right to a fair hearing was infringed by procedural errors.
  • Furthermore the defendant infringed the applicant's rights of defence.
  • In applicant's opinion, the Hungarian authorities were therefore acting in accordance with the market economy investor principle.
  • These procedural failings irretrievably harmed the applicant's rights of defence.
  • Non-acceptance does not prejudice the applicant's right to resubmission.
  • To ensure applicant's rights are not withdrawn due to any administrative failures.
  • The aim of protecting the applicant's rights must be specifically stated.
  • Windows and glazed bulkheads or screens may be glazed or unglazed at the applicant's discretion.
  • the applicant's name and address;
  • Question 2 - The Applicant's justification of the selected pooling of stages is not acceptable.

Alternatives:

  • resumes of the applicant
  • the resumes belonging to the applicant
  • the applicant's CVs
  • the applicant's job applications

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo