🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

appeal was not effective vs appeal was not efficient

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'Appeal was not effective' implies that the appeal did not achieve the desired outcome or result, while 'appeal was not efficient' suggests that the appeal did not use resources (time, money, etc.) effectively. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to emphasize the lack of success in achieving the goal or the inefficient use of resources.

Last updated: March 19, 2024 • 745 views

appeal was not effective

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that the appeal did not achieve the desired outcome or result.
  • respondent's notice of appeal was not effective until the trial court later resolved the pending visitation petition, which in turn constitutes a timely notice of appeal.
  • Bettis also contends his appellate counsel on direct appeal was not effective because he failed to raise the issues now argued. We affirm. Bettis was only ...
  • As a result, the notice of appeal was not effective until entry of the August 8 order denying the motion to reconsider. Contrary to Campbell's contention, F.R.B.P. ...
  • appeal. Given that the explicit appeal was not effective when paired with an unrelated narrative, using a PSA that is unrelated to the episode should be avoided.

Alternatives:

  • appeal was unsuccessful
  • appeal did not work
  • appeal was not successful

appeal was not efficient

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that the appeal did not use resources (time, money, etc.) effectively.
  • appeals. Therefore, 64.12% appellants restrained themselves from pursuing judicial protection. In 35.88% of cases, the administrative appeal was not efficient .

Alternatives:

  • appeal was wasteful
  • appeal was not cost-effective
  • appeal was not productive

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!