TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

anti-abuse vs anti abuse

Both "anti-abuse" and "anti abuse" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Anti-abuse" is commonly used as a compound adjective to describe something that is against abuse, while "anti abuse" may be used when referring to a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 611 views

anti-abuse

This is a correct compound adjective commonly used to describe something that is against abuse.

Use "anti-abuse" when you want to describe something that is against abuse, such as "anti-abuse measures" or "anti-abuse policies."

Examples:

  • The organization implemented strict anti-abuse policies.
  • She is a strong advocate for anti-abuse measures.
  • The software includes anti-abuse features.
  • They are working on developing new anti-abuse technologies.
  • The campaign focuses on promoting anti-abuse awareness.
  • That would maximise the effectiveness of the anti-abuse clause while guaranteeing its proportionality.
  • By launching this latest initiative, the Commission seeks to prompt further discussions with the other institutions on how national anti-abuse measures can meet those requirements.
  • In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid exchange of shares, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
  • In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid resale of assets, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
  • Specific comments: application of anti-abuse rules in relation to third countries
  • Most Member States also have specific anti-abuse measures in their domestic legislation designed to discourage aggressive tax planning structures that are based on artificial location of passive investment in low tax jurisdictions.
  • In this context, it is necessary to take account of the limits imposed by Union law with regard to anti-abuse rules.
  • Here it may be noted that, last December, the Commission adopted a communication on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation.
  • In particular, it proposes coordinated solutions for the implementation of anti-abuse measures, an area in which cooperation between the different administrations is poor, with wholly national approaches.
  • Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend the adoption by Member States of a common general anti-abuse rule, which should also avoid the complexity of many different ones.
  • Moreover, the adjustments to the taxable income as a result of the application of the anti-abuse rules should be limited to the extent that is attributable to the purely artificial arrangement.
  • STRESSES the fact that administrative cooperation can be of key importance in ensuring the effectiveness of anti-abuse measures and underlines therefore the importance of Member States' assistance to each other for the purposes of detecting and combating abusive schemes.
  • Therefore, the inclusion of a common minimum anti-abuse rule in Directive 2011/96/EU would be very helpful to prevent misuse of that Directive and to ensure greater consistency in its application in different Member States.
  • While Member States should use the anti-abuse clause to tackle arrangements which are, in their entirety, not genuine, there may also be cases where single steps or parts of an arrangement are, on a stand-alone basis, not genuine.
  • Member States should be able to use the anti-abuse clause also to tackle those specific steps or parts, without prejudice to the remaining genuine steps or parts of the arrangement.
  • having regard to the Commission's Communication of 10 December 2007 on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries (COM(2007)0785),
  • Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries.
  • Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries
  • This provision has its rationale in anti-abuse tax rules in order to avoid that companies based in tax havens or territories with nil taxation would qualify for the deduction.
  • The application of anti-abuse rules should be proportionate and should serve the specific purpose of tackling an arrangement or a series of arrangements which are not genuine, that is, which do not reflect economic reality.

Alternatives:

  • abuse prevention
  • anti-violence
  • anti-mistreatment
  • anti-harassment
  • anti-exploitation

anti abuse

This is correct when used to express a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

Use "anti abuse" when referring to a general stance against abuse, such as in statements like "We are against abuse" or "She fights against abuse."

Examples:

  • The organization stands firmly against abuse.
  • She is dedicated to fighting against abuse.
  • They have a zero-tolerance policy for abuse.
  • We need to work together to combat abuse.
  • The community is united in its opposition to abuse.
  • These cases show that stronger anti abuse provisions have to be integrated into the directive.
  • That would maximise the effectiveness of the anti-abuse clause while guaranteeing its proportionality.
  • Specific comments: application of anti-abuse rules in relation to third countries
  • In this context, it is necessary to take account of the limits imposed by Union law with regard to anti-abuse rules.
  • The Working Group has agreed to continue its work in the areas of anti-abuse; transparency and exchange of information in the area of transfer pricing and relations with 3rd countries.
  • Here it may be noted that, last December, the Commission adopted a communication on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation.
  • By launching this latest initiative, the Commission seeks to prompt further discussions with the other institutions on how national anti-abuse measures can meet those requirements.
  • The proposal for a directive also contains provisions to review prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work that cannot be justified e.g. on health and anti-abuse grounds.
  • In particular, it proposes coordinated solutions for the implementation of anti-abuse measures, an area in which cooperation between the different administrations is poor, with wholly national approaches.
  • This provision has its rationale in anti-abuse tax rules in order to avoid that companies based in tax havens or territories with nil taxation would qualify for the deduction.
  • It was also agreed that freedom of contract cannot be invoked in order to limit the effects of the so-called anti-abuse clause.
  • As regards the anti-abuse clause, the European Parliament refused to give precedence to freedom of contract to the detriment of the creditor.
  • Most Member States also have specific anti-abuse measures in their domestic legislation designed to discourage aggressive tax planning structures that are based on artificial location of passive investment in low tax jurisdictions.
  • Indeed, TEs benefit from loss carry forward since it enables them to offset a loss and thus pays less tax, which would otherwise be excluded by the anti-abuse rules.
  • Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend the adoption by Member States of a common general anti-abuse rule, which should also avoid the complexity of many different ones.
  • In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid exchange of shares, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
  • In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid resale of assets, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
  • As mentioned earlier, the Netherlands has taken steps to prevent the potential abuse of the Dutch system through the introduction of more stringent anti-abuse rules in the framework of the Code of Conduct for business taxation.
  • To this end, most Member States have adopted a number of anti-abuse rules - specific or general rules which differ from country to country.
  • Moreover, the adjustments to the taxable income as a result of the application of the anti-abuse rules should be limited to the extent that is attributable to the purely artificial arrangement.

Alternatives:

  • against abuse
  • opposed to abuse
  • anti-violence
  • anti-mistreatment
  • anti-harassment

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!