anti-abuse vs anti abuse

Both "anti-abuse" and "anti abuse" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Anti-abuse" is commonly used as a compound adjective to describe something that is against abuse, while "anti abuse" may be used when referring to a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 749 views

This is a correct compound adjective commonly used to describe something that is against abuse.

"anti-abuse"

Use "anti-abuse" when you want to describe something that is against abuse, such as "anti-abuse measures" or "anti-abuse policies."

Examples:

The organization implemented strict anti-abuse policies.
She is a strong advocate for anti-abuse measures.
The software includes anti-abuse features.
They are working on developing new anti-abuse technologies.
The campaign focuses on promoting anti-abuse awareness.

Show examples from the web [+]

That would maximise the effectiveness of the anti-abuse clause while guaranteeing its proportionality.
By launching this latest initiative, the Commission seeks to prompt further discussions with the other institutions on how national anti-abuse measures can meet those requirements.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid exchange of shares, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid resale of assets, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
Specific comments: application of anti-abuse rules in relation to third countries
Most Member States also have specific anti-abuse measures in their domestic legislation designed to discourage aggressive tax planning structures that are based on artificial location of passive investment in low tax jurisdictions.
In this context, it is necessary to take account of the limits imposed by Union law with regard to anti-abuse rules.
Here it may be noted that, last December, the Commission adopted a communication on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation.
In particular, it proposes coordinated solutions for the implementation of anti-abuse measures, an area in which cooperation between the different administrations is poor, with wholly national approaches.
Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend the adoption by Member States of a common general anti-abuse rule, which should also avoid the complexity of many different ones.
Moreover, the adjustments to the taxable income as a result of the application of the anti-abuse rules should be limited to the extent that is attributable to the purely artificial arrangement.
STRESSES the fact that administrative cooperation can be of key importance in ensuring the effectiveness of anti-abuse measures and underlines therefore the importance of Member States' assistance to each other for the purposes of detecting and combating abusive schemes.
Therefore, the inclusion of a common minimum anti-abuse rule in Directive 2011/96/EU would be very helpful to prevent misuse of that Directive and to ensure greater consistency in its application in different Member States.
While Member States should use the anti-abuse clause to tackle arrangements which are, in their entirety, not genuine, there may also be cases where single steps or parts of an arrangement are, on a stand-alone basis, not genuine.
Member States should be able to use the anti-abuse clause also to tackle those specific steps or parts, without prejudice to the remaining genuine steps or parts of the arrangement.
having regard to the Commission's Communication of 10 December 2007 on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries (COM(2007)0785),
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries
This provision has its rationale in anti-abuse tax rules in order to avoid that companies based in tax havens or territories with nil taxation would qualify for the deduction.
The application of anti-abuse rules should be proportionate and should serve the specific purpose of tackling an arrangement or a series of arrangements which are not genuine, that is, which do not reflect economic reality.

Alternatives:

abuse prevention
anti-violence
anti-mistreatment
anti-harassment
anti-exploitation

This is correct when used to express a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

"anti abuse"

Use "anti abuse" when referring to a general stance against abuse, such as in statements like "We are against abuse" or "She fights against abuse."

Examples:

The organization stands firmly against abuse.
She is dedicated to fighting against abuse.
They have a zero-tolerance policy for abuse.
We need to work together to combat abuse.
The community is united in its opposition to abuse.

Show examples from the web [+]

These cases show that stronger anti abuse provisions have to be integrated into the directive.
That would maximise the effectiveness of the anti-abuse clause while guaranteeing its proportionality.
Specific comments: application of anti-abuse rules in relation to third countries
In this context, it is necessary to take account of the limits imposed by Union law with regard to anti-abuse rules.
The Working Group has agreed to continue its work in the areas of anti-abuse; transparency and exchange of information in the area of transfer pricing and relations with 3rd countries.
Here it may be noted that, last December, the Commission adopted a communication on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation.
By launching this latest initiative, the Commission seeks to prompt further discussions with the other institutions on how national anti-abuse measures can meet those requirements.
The proposal for a directive also contains provisions to review prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work that cannot be justified e.g. on health and anti-abuse grounds.
In particular, it proposes coordinated solutions for the implementation of anti-abuse measures, an area in which cooperation between the different administrations is poor, with wholly national approaches.
This provision has its rationale in anti-abuse tax rules in order to avoid that companies based in tax havens or territories with nil taxation would qualify for the deduction.
It was also agreed that freedom of contract cannot be invoked in order to limit the effects of the so-called anti-abuse clause.
As regards the anti-abuse clause, the European Parliament refused to give precedence to freedom of contract to the detriment of the creditor.
Most Member States also have specific anti-abuse measures in their domestic legislation designed to discourage aggressive tax planning structures that are based on artificial location of passive investment in low tax jurisdictions.
Indeed, TEs benefit from loss carry forward since it enables them to offset a loss and thus pays less tax, which would otherwise be excluded by the anti-abuse rules.
Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend the adoption by Member States of a common general anti-abuse rule, which should also avoid the complexity of many different ones.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid exchange of shares, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid resale of assets, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
As mentioned earlier, the Netherlands has taken steps to prevent the potential abuse of the Dutch system through the introduction of more stringent anti-abuse rules in the framework of the Code of Conduct for business taxation.
To this end, most Member States have adopted a number of anti-abuse rules - specific or general rules which differ from country to country.
Moreover, the adjustments to the taxable income as a result of the application of the anti-abuse rules should be limited to the extent that is attributable to the purely artificial arrangement.

Alternatives:

against abuse
opposed to abuse
anti-violence
anti-mistreatment
anti-harassment

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

anti-abuse vs anti abuse

"anti-abuse"

"anti abuse"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text