anti-abuse vs anti abuse

Both "anti-abuse" and "anti abuse" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Anti-abuse" is commonly used as a compound adjective to describe something that is against abuse, while "anti abuse" may be used when referring to a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 640 views

anti-abuse

This is a correct compound adjective commonly used to describe something that is against abuse.

Use "anti-abuse" when you want to describe something that is against abuse, such as "anti-abuse measures" or "anti-abuse policies."

Examples:

The organization implemented strict anti-abuse policies.
She is a strong advocate for anti-abuse measures.
The software includes anti-abuse features.
They are working on developing new anti-abuse technologies.
The campaign focuses on promoting anti-abuse awareness.

Show examples from the web [+]

That would maximise the effectiveness of the anti-abuse clause while guaranteeing its proportionality.
By launching this latest initiative, the Commission seeks to prompt further discussions with the other institutions on how national anti-abuse measures can meet those requirements.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid exchange of shares, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
In order to avoid possible abuses related to the rapid resale of assets, Member States shall apply an anti-abuse provision aimed at establishing a minimum holding period of 1 year, with the possibility for each Member State to extend it to 2 years.
Specific comments: application of anti-abuse rules in relation to third countries
Most Member States also have specific anti-abuse measures in their domestic legislation designed to discourage aggressive tax planning structures that are based on artificial location of passive investment in low tax jurisdictions.
In this context, it is necessary to take account of the limits imposed by Union law with regard to anti-abuse rules.
Here it may be noted that, last December, the Commission adopted a communication on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation.
In particular, it proposes coordinated solutions for the implementation of anti-abuse measures, an area in which cooperation between the different administrations is poor, with wholly national approaches.
Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend the adoption by Member States of a common general anti-abuse rule, which should also avoid the complexity of many different ones.
Moreover, the adjustments to the taxable income as a result of the application of the anti-abuse rules should be limited to the extent that is attributable to the purely artificial arrangement.
STRESSES the fact that administrative cooperation can be of key importance in ensuring the effectiveness of anti-abuse measures and underlines therefore the importance of Member States' assistance to each other for the purposes of detecting and combating abusive schemes.
Therefore, the inclusion of a common minimum anti-abuse rule in Directive 2011/96/EU would be very helpful to prevent misuse of that Directive and to ensure greater consistency in its application in different Member States.
While Member States should use the anti-abuse clause to tackle arrangements which are, in their entirety, not genuine, there may also be cases where single steps or parts of an arrangement are, on a stand-alone basis, not genuine.
Member States should be able to use the anti-abuse clause also to tackle those specific steps or parts, without prejudice to the remaining genuine steps or parts of the arrangement.
having regard to the Commission's Communication of 10 December 2007 on the application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries (COM(2007)0785),
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee - The application of anti-abuse measures in the area of direct taxation - within the EU and in relation to third countries
This provision has its rationale in anti-abuse tax rules in order to avoid that companies based in tax havens or territories with nil taxation would qualify for the deduction.
The application of anti-abuse rules should be proportionate and should serve the specific purpose of tackling an arrangement or a series of arrangements which are not genuine, that is, which do not reflect economic reality.

Alternatives:

abuse prevention
anti-violence
anti-mistreatment
anti-harassment
anti-exploitation

anti abuse

This is correct when used to express a general stance against abuse without being part of a compound adjective.

Use "anti abuse" when referring to a general stance against abuse, such as in statements like "We are against abuse" or "She fights against abuse."