TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

all parses to vs the possible parses of

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "All parses to" is used when referring to the overall meaning or interpretation of something, while "the possible parses of" is used when discussing the specific interpretations or options available. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last updated: March 19, 2024 • 478 views

all parses to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the overall meaning or interpretation of something.

This phrase is used to indicate the general interpretation or understanding of a particular concept or statement.
  • merating and scoring all parses to identify the best one. We identify and study two general classes of scoring functions called linear and coverage-based which ...
  • best parse from a set of possible analyses, and not from all parses to which the model would assign non-zero probability. To further test the relationship between  ...
  • per, for two reasons: we evaluate only on sentences for which a parse was returned instead of all parses, to enable direct com- parison with Clark and Curran ...
  • Aug 3, 2015 ... b) All parSes to agree the approach a) Compare BRDs to RRC rules captured -‐. Highlight gaps b) QualitaSve req. healthcheck – Wipro and.

the possible parses of

This phrase is also correct and commonly used in English when discussing the specific interpretations or options available for something.

This phrase is used to refer to the various potential interpretations or analyses of a particular text, statement, or concept.
  • The possible parses of a word are generated by a morphological analyzer. In Turk- ish, close to half the words in running text are mor- phologically ambiguous.
  • the possible parses of the missing word. The unsupervised baseline disambiguates 39.4% of the ambiguous words correctly while the supervised baseline ...
  • Basically in semantic analysis, we try to obtain an initial representation of the meaning of the sentence from the possible parses of the syntactic analysis stage.
  • some of the possible parses of the empty string against this grammar are: ϵ, ϵϵ, (ϵϵ)ϵ, ϵ(ϵϵ), .... The SPPF representation compresses all these to a single ...

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!