aid in the future growth of vs aid in the future growth

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Aid in the future growth of' is used when specifying what will be aided, while 'aid in the future growth' is more general and does not specify the object of the aid.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 531 views

aid in the future growth of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when specifying what will be aided in the future growth.

This phrase is used when you want to specify the particular aspect or entity that will be aided in the future growth.

Examples:

The new investment will aid in the future growth of the company.
Education plays a crucial role in aiding in the future growth of individuals.

Show examples from the web [+]

The Single Market is crucial for the future growth of the EU economy.
The Single Market itself and the enterprises operating within it are vital for the future growth of EU economies.
I believe that this is a path we should swiftly follow in order to promote the future growth of transport which will, in the Commission's words, be 'smarter, safer and cleaner'.
This provides an opportunity for recipients to become self-sufficient, which means they will not be dependent on aid in the future.
The Commission considers therefore that RMG should not receive any aid in the future as compensation for legacy costs in respect of pension liabilities accruing after 31 March 2012 for RMPP members.
A market economy investor will value a company at such a depressed price only if he has exceptionally negative expectations for the growth of the net income in the future.
At present, a considerable amount of investments is either underway or being planned, involving several countries, with a planned capacity, if they are realised, that would be expected to satisfy the future growth of demand for LNG in Europe.
This is a critical area for the future growth of the European economy and one I can cite as a practical example of what is being delivered on the Lisbon Agenda.
In this case, I believe that new generation harmonised air traffic management is necessary to sustain the future growth of air traffic in European skies in economic and environmental terms.
[9] Most aid will take the form of decoupled aid in the future.
Parliament is supporting Commission plans to reform the state aid rules, with the aim of having less, but better state aid in the future.
That is why I consider it necessary - as the Commission recognises - to maintain this kind of aid in the future as well.
Although we cannot and should not expect the same level of structural fund aid in the future, it is nonetheless important that there is a reasonable transition period.
The OECD agreement should form the framework for regulating our aid in the future.
Environmental aid in the future can also be used to lessen the burden production places on the environment.
It is not comfortable to accept the growth of trade liberalisation and a 'tariff only' system in the future, as the Commission has concluded, but it must be faced.
In the future enlarged EU, it will be necessary drastically to cut back on agricultural aid, to reform structural funds and to create room for growth through private enterprise.
What will the Commission do to ensure that such disadvantaged regions continue to receive European aid in the future?
However, the introduction of a stabiliser (maximum quantity eligible for aid in the EU) could be a problem if it jeopardises the further development of organic farming in the future, given that the aid is almost exclusively for fodder plant seed.
What financial transparency criteria does the Commission believe it needs to demand from the PA as a pre-condition for maintaining EU aid in the future?

Alternatives:

contribute to the future growth of
support the future growth of
facilitate the future growth of