⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

against the appeal judgment vs to the appeal judgment

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Against the appeal judgment' is used when referring to a position or action opposing the judgment, while 'to the appeal judgment' is used when indicating a direction or relationship towards the judgment.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 663 views

against the appeal judgment

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a position or action opposing the judgment.

This phrase is used to indicate opposition or disagreement with the appeal judgment.

Examples:

  • The defendant filed an appeal against the appeal judgment.
  • The prosecutor argued against the appeal judgment.
  • The decision was made against the appeal judgment.
  • The appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance was dismissed on 2 April 2009 by the Court of Justice, in Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission ECR I-2369.
  • The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
  • The appellant justifies his appeal against the above judgment as follows.
  • Furthermore, the Commission's appeal against the judgment of the CFI is still pending.
  • The Commission did not appeal against the judgment of the General Court.
  • The appeal against the judgment, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002, is based on three pleas in law.
  • allow the Appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 (Case T-108/09);
  • declare that the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-363/04 for infringement of Community law was lodged in good time and in due form;
  • The Commission decided not to lodge an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2006.
  • The Appellant relies upon three grounds of appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
  • Appeals against the judgments of the Court of First Instance are pending in the Court of Justice [5].
  • The Commission relies on a single plea against the judgment under appeal, alleging a breach of Community law in paragraphs 79 to 91 of that judgment.
  • The appellant argues four grounds in support of its appeal against the above judgment of the Court of First Instance.
  • Appeal against the foreign judgment whose enforcement is sought (Article 46)
  • In support of its appeal against the aforementioned judgment, the appellant makes the following submissions:
  • allow the Appeal against the Judgment of the General Court and annul the Judgment of the General Court, to annul the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal and, as appropriate, the decision of the Opposition Division;
  • Summary of the grounds of appeal raised by the appellant in the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 September 2007 in Case T-304/05
  • The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against this judgment (Judgment of 8 December 2011 in Case C-81/10 P France Télécom, see in particular points 43 et seq.).
  • A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.
  • A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.

Alternatives:

  • opposing the appeal judgment
  • contrary to the appeal judgment
  • challenging the appeal judgment
  • disagreeing with the appeal judgment
  • in opposition to the appeal judgment

to the appeal judgment

This phrase is correct and commonly used when indicating a direction or relationship towards the judgment.

This phrase is used to show a connection or reference to the appeal judgment.

Examples:

  • The new evidence is crucial to the appeal judgment.
  • The decision is relevant to the appeal judgment.
  • The arguments presented are central to the appeal judgment.
  • Declare that the action which gave rise to the judgment under appeal is perfectly admissible.
  • In support of the present appeal, the appellant raises five pleas to have the judgment under appeal set aside in part.
  • In the Commission's view, can EU legislation be used to appeal against the judgment in this case?
  • There shall be no further ordinary appeal or cassation against an appeal judgment.
  • - for an appeal judgment, the provision is based on Article 61 of the Statute relating to appeals,
  • The appeal is against the judgment of the General Court by which the appellants' action for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/878/EC of 2 July 2008 was dismissed.
  • The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against this judgment (Judgment of 8 December 2011 in Case C-81/10 P France Télécom, see in particular points 43 et seq.).
  • The appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance was dismissed on 2 April 2009 by the Court of Justice, in Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission ECR I-2369.
  • Since the factual and legal background has already been set out in the judgment under appeal, it is to be recapitulated in the response only quite exceptionally, in so far as its presentation in the appeal is disputed or calls for further particulars.
  • The Total company has already announced its decision to appeal against this judgment.
  • The Tunis Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment on 10 June 2005.
  • The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
  • The appeal is against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM by which the appellant's action was dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
  • The appeal against the judgment, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002, is based on three pleas in law.
  • allow the Appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 (Case T-108/09);
  • The appellant justifies his appeal against the above judgment as follows.
  • Annul the judgment under appeal fully and unconditionally;
  • The applicant also submits that the judgment under appeal is vitiated by manifest inconsistency and illogicality.
  • Why did the Commission not appeal against this judgment?
  • Furthermore, the Commission's appeal against the judgment of the CFI is still pending.

Alternatives:

  • related to the appeal judgment
  • connected to the appeal judgment
  • pertaining to the appeal judgment
  • in relation to the appeal judgment
  • with respect to the appeal judgment

Related Comparisons

towards the appeal judgment vs against the appeal judgment the unfair judgment vs following, a brief summary is following is a brief summary about vs the unfair judgment the unfair judgment vs a brief summary about the unfair judgment vs a brief summary about each item the unfair judgment vs a breif summary about each item

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!