against the appeal judgment vs to the appeal judgment

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Against the appeal judgment' is used when referring to a position or action opposing the judgment, while 'to the appeal judgment' is used when indicating a direction or relationship towards the judgment.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 777 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a position or action opposing the judgment.

"against the appeal judgment"

This phrase is used to indicate opposition or disagreement with the appeal judgment.

Examples:

The defendant filed an appeal against the appeal judgment.
The prosecutor argued against the appeal judgment.
The decision was made against the appeal judgment.

Show examples from the web [+]

The appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance was dismissed on 2 April 2009 by the Court of Justice, in Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission ECR I-2369.
The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
The appellant justifies his appeal against the above judgment as follows.
Furthermore, the Commission's appeal against the judgment of the CFI is still pending.
The Commission did not appeal against the judgment of the General Court.
The appeal against the judgment, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002, is based on three pleas in law.
allow the Appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 (Case T-108/09);
declare that the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-363/04 for infringement of Community law was lodged in good time and in due form;
The Commission decided not to lodge an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2006.
The Appellant relies upon three grounds of appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
Appeals against the judgments of the Court of First Instance are pending in the Court of Justice [5].
The Commission relies on a single plea against the judgment under appeal, alleging a breach of Community law in paragraphs 79 to 91 of that judgment.
The appellant argues four grounds in support of its appeal against the above judgment of the Court of First Instance.
Appeal against the foreign judgment whose enforcement is sought (Article 46)
In support of its appeal against the aforementioned judgment, the appellant makes the following submissions:
allow the Appeal against the Judgment of the General Court and annul the Judgment of the General Court, to annul the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal and, as appropriate, the decision of the Opposition Division;
Summary of the grounds of appeal raised by the appellant in the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 September 2007 in Case T-304/05
The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against this judgment (Judgment of 8 December 2011 in Case C-81/10 P France Télécom, see in particular points 43 et seq.).
A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.
A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.

Alternatives:

opposing the appeal judgment
contrary to the appeal judgment
challenging the appeal judgment
disagreeing with the appeal judgment
in opposition to the appeal judgment

This phrase is correct and commonly used when indicating a direction or relationship towards the judgment.

"to the appeal judgment"

This phrase is used to show a connection or reference to the appeal judgment.

Examples:

The new evidence is crucial to the appeal judgment.
The decision is relevant to the appeal judgment.
The arguments presented are central to the appeal judgment.

Show examples from the web [+]

Declare that the action which gave rise to the judgment under appeal is perfectly admissible.
In support of the present appeal, the appellant raises five pleas to have the judgment under appeal set aside in part.
In the Commission's view, can EU legislation be used to appeal against the judgment in this case?
There shall be no further ordinary appeal or cassation against an appeal judgment.
- for an appeal judgment, the provision is based on Article 61 of the Statute relating to appeals,
The appeal is against the judgment of the General Court by which the appellants' action for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/878/EC of 2 July 2008 was dismissed.
The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against this judgment (Judgment of 8 December 2011 in Case C-81/10 P France Télécom, see in particular points 43 et seq.).
The appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance was dismissed on 2 April 2009 by the Court of Justice, in Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission ECR I-2369.
Since the factual and legal background has already been set out in the judgment under appeal, it is to be recapitulated in the response only quite exceptionally, in so far as its presentation in the appeal is disputed or calls for further particulars.
The Total company has already announced its decision to appeal against this judgment.
The Tunis Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment on 10 June 2005.
The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
The appeal is against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM by which the appellant's action was dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
The appeal against the judgment, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002, is based on three pleas in law.
allow the Appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 (Case T-108/09);
The appellant justifies his appeal against the above judgment as follows.
Annul the judgment under appeal fully and unconditionally;
The applicant also submits that the judgment under appeal is vitiated by manifest inconsistency and illogicality.
Why did the Commission not appeal against this judgment?
Furthermore, the Commission's appeal against the judgment of the CFI is still pending.

Alternatives:

related to the appeal judgment
connected to the appeal judgment
pertaining to the appeal judgment
in relation to the appeal judgment
with respect to the appeal judgment

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

against the appeal judgment vs to the appeal judgment