"Having reviewed" vs "after having reviewed"

Question

"Having reviewed" vs "after having reviewed"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'After having reviewed' is used when you want to emphasize that the action of reviewing took place before another action or event. 'Having reviewed' is more concise and can be used to simply state that the reviewing has been done.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

This phrase is more concise and straightforward, indicating that the reviewing has been completed without focusing on the specific timing.

Examples:

Having reviewed the report, he prepared his presentation.
Having reviewed all the options, she chose the best one.

Alternatives:

Reviewed
Completed the review
Finished reviewing
Concluded the review
Reviewed and analyzed

This phrase is used to indicate that the reviewing occurred before a specific point in time or before another action. It adds a temporal sequence to the sentence.

Examples:

After having reviewed all the documents, she made her decision.
After having reviewed the proposal, the committee reached a consensus.

Alternatives:

After reviewing
Following the review
Upon reviewing
Once the review was completed
Having completed the review

Answer 1

Having reviewed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to simply state that the reviewing has been done without emphasizing the temporal sequence.

Answer 2

after having reviewed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize that the action of reviewing took place before another action or event.

"Having reviewed" vs "after having reviewed"

Having reviewed

after having reviewed

Related Comparisons