TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

after compare with vs after compared with

The correct phrase is 'after compared with.' The preposition 'after' is followed by the past participle 'compared,' not the base form 'compare.' This construction is commonly used in English.

Last updated: March 25, 2024 • 3162 views

after compare with

This phrase is incorrect in English. The verb 'compare' should be in the past participle form 'compared' when used after 'after.'

Incorrect. Use 'after compared with' instead.
  • Let's compare notes after dessert.
  • We'll compare notes after this meeting - and see where we end up.
  • This test grabs the hardware address of the bluetooth adapter after suspend and compares it to the address grabbed before suspend.
  • Compare, after all, our common agreement with the experience we had just recently at that tele-conferencing session with members of the US Congress, which frankly was a very depressing experience.
  • for exposures with a rising risk profile after one year, compare on a regular basis the estimate of a relevant measure of exposure over one year with the same exposure measure over the life of the exposure;
  • Resolve the digested fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis as before and observe characteristic restriction fragment pattern under UV transillumination after ethidium bromide staining and compare with the undigested and digested positive control.
  • For instance, it was not clear what the solvency and liquidity ratios would be after the aid was paid and how they would compare with those of competitors in the relevant markets.
  • After 15 minutes measure the optical density of the sample solution with the spectrophotometer at 420 nm. Compare with the blank test solution of the reagents.
  • Your short swords can't compare with my spear.
  • Nothing compares with what women go through.
  • Ingushetia currently has more refugees than the indigenous population, with no humanitarian aid to compare with Kosovo.
  • Our Milton craftsmanship can compare with the very best.
  • We have two photographs to compare with the original plate back in England.
  • I was so worried I wouldn't compare with Hannah.
  • I have nothing to compare with it.
  • I would never be able to compare with him.
  • Yes, I can not compare with other fighters.
  • Like I said, not compare with him.
  • I have nothing to compare with it.
  • Not that our local wines compare with Europe's.

Alternatives:

  • after compared with

after compared with

This phrase is correct in English. 'After compared with' is the appropriate construction when comparing two things.

Correct. Use 'after compared with' when referring to a comparison between two things.
  • There were fewer side effects after the second vaccination compared with the first.
  • A consequence of the pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues is that if hypoglycaemia occurs, it may occur earlier after an injection when compared with soluble human insulin.
  • There were fewer reactions after the second vaccination compared with the first.
  • In the study carried out during an epidemic, 1% of the people taking Tamiflu developed flu after contact, compared with 5% of those taking placebo.
  • In the study of perennial allergic rhinitis, AVAMYS reduced scores by 3.6 points after four weeks, compared with a reduction of 2.8 points with placebo.
  • A consequence of the pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues is that if hypoglycaemia occurs, it may occur earlier after an injection when compared with soluble human insulin.
  • In the study of perennial allergic rhinitis, Fluticasone Furoate GSK reduced scores by 3.6 points after four weeks, compared with a reduction of 2.8 points with placebo.
  • When NEVANAC was compared with placebo, around 70% of the patients using NEVANAC had no signs of inflammation after two weeks, compared with 17% to 59% of those using placebo.
  • Patients experienced relief an average of 2.0 to 2.5 hours after receiving Firazyr, compared with 12.0 hours after receiving tranexamic acid and 4.6 hours after receiving placebo.
  • The addition of 100 mg sitagliptin to metformin reduced HbA1c levels by 0.67% (from around 8.0%) after 24 weeks, compared with a fall of 0.02% in the patients adding placebo.
  • In the study where sitagliptin was added to glimepiride and metformin, the levels of HbA1c were reduced by 0.59% after 24 weeks, compared with an increase of 0.30% in the patients adding placebo.
  • In the first study, patients taking Tracleer had an average of 1.4 new digital ulcers after 16 weeks, compared with 2.7 in the patients taking placebo.
  • In subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, inhaled human insulin has a faster onset of glucose lowering effect in the early hours after dosing when compared with subcutaneously administered fast- al
  • In the two studies of patients with a BMI of 28 kg/ m2 or more, patients taking Alli 60 mg had lost an average of 4.8 kg after a year, compared with 2.3 kg in those taking placebo.
  • In the first study of adults with type 1 diabetes, there was a decrease of 0.14% (from 7.60% to 7.46%) after six months, compared with a decrease of 0.14% for insulin lispro.
  • Looking at the results of the two main studies taken together, around 69% of the patients receiving Stelara responded to treatment after 12 weeks, compared with around 3% of the patients receiving placebo.
  • In the study of treatment-naïve adults, 79% of the patients taking Kaletra (259 out of 326) had viral loads below 400 copies/ ml after 24 weeks, compared with 71% of the patients taking nelfinavir (233 out of 327).
  • Symptom scores were around 100 points at the start of the study, but had fallen by around 25 points in the patients receiving Zypadhera after eight weeks, compared with around 9 points in the patients receiving placebo.
  • In the main study in dogs, 95% of the animals treated with Oxyglobin needed no other type of oxygen-carrying treatment after 24 hours, compared with 32% of the dogs that did not receive any treatment.
  • The rate of return was fixed by using the Capital Asset Pricing Model after having compared other competing real estate companies.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!