TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

after compare with vs after compared with

The correct phrase is 'after compared with.' The preposition 'after' is followed by the past participle 'compared,' not the base form 'compare.' This construction is commonly used in English.

Last updated: March 25, 2024 • 3331 views

This phrase is incorrect in English. The verb 'compare' should be in the past participle form 'compared' when used after 'after.'

"after compare with"

Incorrect. Use 'after compared with' instead.
  • Let's compare notes after dessert.
  • We'll compare notes after this meeting - and see where we end up.
  • This test grabs the hardware address of the bluetooth adapter after suspend and compares it to the address grabbed before suspend.
  • Compare, after all, our common agreement with the experience we had just recently at that tele-conferencing session with members of the US Congress, which frankly was a very depressing experience.
  • for exposures with a rising risk profile after one year, compare on a regular basis the estimate of a relevant measure of exposure over one year with the same exposure measure over the life of the exposure;
  • Resolve the digested fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis as before and observe characteristic restriction fragment pattern under UV transillumination after ethidium bromide staining and compare with the undigested and digested positive control.
  • For instance, it was not clear what the solvency and liquidity ratios would be after the aid was paid and how they would compare with those of competitors in the relevant markets.
  • After 15 minutes measure the optical density of the sample solution with the spectrophotometer at 420 nm. Compare with the blank test solution of the reagents.
  • Your short swords can't compare with my spear.
  • Nothing compares with what women go through.
  • Ingushetia currently has more refugees than the indigenous population, with no humanitarian aid to compare with Kosovo.
  • Our Milton craftsmanship can compare with the very best.
  • We have two photographs to compare with the original plate back in England.
  • I was so worried I wouldn't compare with Hannah.
  • I have nothing to compare with it.
  • I would never be able to compare with him.
  • Yes, I can not compare with other fighters.
  • Like I said, not compare with him.
  • I have nothing to compare with it.
  • Not that our local wines compare with Europe's.

Alternatives:

  • after compared with

This phrase is correct in English. 'After compared with' is the appropriate construction when comparing two things.

"after compared with"

Correct. Use 'after compared with' when referring to a comparison between two things.
  • There were fewer side effects after the second vaccination compared with the first.
  • A consequence of the pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues is that if hypoglycaemia occurs, it may occur earlier after an injection when compared with soluble human insulin.
  • There were fewer reactions after the second vaccination compared with the first.
  • In the study carried out during an epidemic, 1% of the people taking Tamiflu developed flu after contact, compared with 5% of those taking placebo.
  • In the study of perennial allergic rhinitis, AVAMYS reduced scores by 3.6 points after four weeks, compared with a reduction of 2.8 points with placebo.
  • A consequence of the pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues is that if hypoglycaemia occurs, it may occur earlier after an injection when compared with soluble human insulin.
  • In the study of perennial allergic rhinitis, Fluticasone Furoate GSK reduced scores by 3.6 points after four weeks, compared with a reduction of 2.8 points with placebo.
  • When NEVANAC was compared with placebo, around 70% of the patients using NEVANAC had no signs of inflammation after two weeks, compared with 17% to 59% of those using placebo.
  • Patients experienced relief an average of 2.0 to 2.5 hours after receiving Firazyr, compared with 12.0 hours after receiving tranexamic acid and 4.6 hours after receiving placebo.
  • The addition of 100 mg sitagliptin to metformin reduced HbA1c levels by 0.67% (from around 8.0%) after 24 weeks, compared with a fall of 0.02% in the patients adding placebo.
  • In the study where sitagliptin was added to glimepiride and metformin, the levels of HbA1c were reduced by 0.59% after 24 weeks, compared with an increase of 0.30% in the patients adding placebo.
  • In the first study, patients taking Tracleer had an average of 1.4 new digital ulcers after 16 weeks, compared with 2.7 in the patients taking placebo.
  • In subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, inhaled human insulin has a faster onset of glucose lowering effect in the early hours after dosing when compared with subcutaneously administered fast- al
  • In the two studies of patients with a BMI of 28 kg/ m2 or more, patients taking Alli 60 mg had lost an average of 4.8 kg after a year, compared with 2.3 kg in those taking placebo.
  • In the first study of adults with type 1 diabetes, there was a decrease of 0.14% (from 7.60% to 7.46%) after six months, compared with a decrease of 0.14% for insulin lispro.
  • Looking at the results of the two main studies taken together, around 69% of the patients receiving Stelara responded to treatment after 12 weeks, compared with around 3% of the patients receiving placebo.
  • In the study of treatment-naïve adults, 79% of the patients taking Kaletra (259 out of 326) had viral loads below 400 copies/ ml after 24 weeks, compared with 71% of the patients taking nelfinavir (233 out of 327).
  • Symptom scores were around 100 points at the start of the study, but had fallen by around 25 points in the patients receiving Zypadhera after eight weeks, compared with around 9 points in the patients receiving placebo.
  • In the main study in dogs, 95% of the animals treated with Oxyglobin needed no other type of oxygen-carrying treatment after 24 hours, compared with 32% of the dogs that did not receive any treatment.
  • The rate of return was fixed by using the Capital Asset Pricing Model after having compared other competing real estate companies.

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo