"accpeted" vs "accpeted by sb"

Question

"accpeted" vs "accpeted by sb"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Accepted by sb' is used when referring to being accepted by a specific person or group, while 'accepted' can be used in a more general sense without specifying who accepted something.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone or something has been accepted without specifying the specific person or group who accepted it. It is a more general way of expressing acceptance.

Examples:

His apology was accepted.
The terms of the contract were accepted.
The offer was accepted.
The decision was accepted by all.
The proposal was accepted unanimously.

Alternatives:

approved
endorsed
agreed upon
validated
ratified

This phrase is used to indicate that someone or something has been accepted by a particular individual or entity. It is often followed by the name or pronoun of the person or group who accepted the subject.

Examples:

Her proposal was accepted by the committee.
The job offer was accepted by John.
The invitation was accepted by all the guests.
The terms were accepted by both parties.
The idea was accepted by the team.

Alternatives:

approved by sb
endorsed by sb
agreed upon by sb
validated by sb
ratified by sb

Answer 1

accpeted

This phrase is correct and can be used in a more general sense without specifying who accepted something.

Answer 2

accpeted by sb

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to being accepted by a specific person or group.

"accpeted" vs "accpeted by sb"

accpeted

accpeted by sb

Related Comparisons