"a lower level of expenditure" vs "a lower level of money"

Question

"a lower level of expenditure" vs "a lower level of money"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'A lower level of expenditure' is commonly used when referring to the amount of money spent, while 'a lower level of money' is less common and might be used when discussing the amount of money available or in circulation.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate a reduced amount of money being spent on something.

Examples:

The company aimed to achieve a lower level of expenditure by cutting costs.
The government is trying to maintain a lower level of expenditure to reduce the budget deficit.

Alternatives:

reduced spending level
decreased expenditure amount
lower cost level

This phrase can be used to indicate a reduced amount of money available or in circulation.

Examples:

The country experienced a lower level of money in circulation due to the economic crisis.
The charity organization faced a lower level of money available for its projects.

Alternatives:

reduced money amount
decreased cash level
lower financial resources

Answer 1

a lower level of expenditure

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the amount of money spent.

Answer 2

a lower level of money

This phrase is correct but less common. It might be used when discussing the amount of money available or in circulation.

"a lower level of expenditure" vs "a lower level of money"

a lower level of expenditure

a lower level of money

Related Comparisons