"have put in place" vs "have been put in place"

Question

"have put in place" vs "have been put in place"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Have been put in place' is passive voice, indicating that someone else has placed something, while 'have put in place' is active voice, indicating that the subject has placed something. The choice between them depends on whether you want to emphasize who performed the action.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used in active voice to indicate that the subject has established or implemented something.

Examples:

The company has put in place new procedures to streamline operations.
The government has put in place measures to address the issue.
The team has put in place a plan to increase productivity.

Alternatives:

have implemented
have established
have introduced
have enforced
have enacted

This phrase is used in passive voice to indicate that something has been established or implemented by someone else.

Examples:

New safety measures have been put in place to protect the workers.
Strict regulations have been put in place to prevent pollution.
New policies have been put in place to improve customer service.

Alternatives:

have been implemented
have been established
have been introduced
have been enforced
have been enacted

Answer 1

have put in place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in active voice constructions.

Answer 2

have been put in place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in passive voice constructions.

"have put in place" vs "have been put in place"

have put in place

have been put in place

Related Comparisons