claim for prohibition of business vs claim for prohibition of business operation

Some examples from the web:

• claim for prohibition of business
• In their comments on the extension decision, Greece and HSY claim that the prohibition of additional restructuring aid only renders any new aid unlawful.
• there must be no provision for a system of gross reserving which requires the pledging of assets to cover unearned premiums and outstanding claims provisions (prohibition of deposit of security);
• Since a registration procedure evaluating the scientific substantiation is foreseen for all health claims, specific prohibitions no longer have to be expressly laid down.
• The Belgian authorities therefore could not claim that the prohibition on paying a guarantee deemed to be incompatible aid was contrary to Union law.
• These exceptions are granted on the grounds that a complete prohibition of claims arising from these practices would be unnecessary from an economic point of view and might prove very costly to implement.'
• The applicant also claims that the prohibition at issue from making payment of the aid of EUR 800000, granted in 2003 within a programme of regional aid approved by the Commission, infringes the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.

Some examples from the web:

• claim for prohibition of business operation
• In their comments on the extension decision, Greece and HSY claim that the prohibition of additional restructuring aid only renders any new aid unlawful.
• there must be no provision for a system of gross reserving which requires the pledging of assets to cover unearned premiums and outstanding claims provisions (prohibition of deposit of security);
• Since a registration procedure evaluating the scientific substantiation is foreseen for all health claims, specific prohibitions no longer have to be expressly laid down.
• The Belgian authorities therefore could not claim that the prohibition on paying a guarantee deemed to be incompatible aid was contrary to Union law.
• These exceptions are granted on the grounds that a complete prohibition of claims arising from these practices would be unnecessary from an economic point of view and might prove very costly to implement.'
• The applicant also claims that the prohibition at issue from making payment of the aid of EUR 800000, granted in 2003 within a programme of regional aid approved by the Commission, infringes the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.