"the redundancy of" vs "the redundancy in"

Question

"the redundancy of" vs "the redundancy in"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The redundancy in' is used when referring to the specific redundant elements within something, while 'the redundancy of' is used when discussing the concept or existence of redundancy in general.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used when discussing the concept or existence of redundancy in general. It is used to talk about the overall idea of redundancy rather than specific instances.

Examples:

The report highlighted the redundancy of having two separate departments for the same task.
She explained the redundancy of using both a pen and a pencil for the exam.

Alternatives:

the superfluity of
the excess of
the surplus of
the duplication of
the repetition of

This phrase is used when referring to the specific redundant elements within something. It indicates the location or presence of redundancy within a particular context.

Examples:

The redundancy in his speech made it difficult to follow.
I noticed the redundancy in the system's backup procedures.

Alternatives:

the repetition in
the duplication in
the superfluity in
the excess in
the surplus in

Answer 1

the redundancy of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

the redundancy in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"the redundancy of" vs "the redundancy in"

the redundancy of

the redundancy in

Related Comparisons