"he would be furious" vs "he's going to be furious"

Question

"he would be furious" vs "he's going to be furious"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'He would be furious' implies a hypothetical situation or a condition that is not certain to happen, while 'He's going to be furious' indicates a future event that is likely to occur. The choice between the two depends on the context and the level of certainty about the future outcome.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is used to talk about a possible future reaction or emotion in a hypothetical scenario. It implies that the person would feel furious if a certain condition were met.

Examples:

If he found out about the prank, he would be furious.
He would be furious if he missed the deadline.

Alternatives:

he might be furious
he could be furious
he may be furious
he is likely to be furious
he is expected to be furious

This phrase is used to predict a future reaction or emotion with a high level of certainty. It implies that the person will feel furious based on the current situation or actions.

Examples:

If you tell him the news, he's going to be furious.
He's going to be furious when he sees the mess in the kitchen.

Alternatives:

he will be furious
he is going to get furious
he is sure to be furious
he is bound to be furious
he is destined to be furious

Answer 1

he would be furious

This phrase is correct and commonly used to express a hypothetical situation or a condition that may not happen.

Answer 2

he's going to be furious

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate a future event that is likely to happen.