"scheduling meeting during lunch" vs "to schedule a meeting at lunch time"

Question

"scheduling meeting during lunch" vs "to schedule a meeting at lunch time"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different structures. 'Scheduling meeting during lunch' is a more concise and informal way of expressing the idea, while 'to schedule a meeting at lunch time' is a more formal and complete sentence. The choice between them depends on the context and the level of formality required.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is a concise way to express the idea of arranging a meeting to take place during the lunch period.

Examples:

I'm scheduling a meeting during lunch tomorrow.
Let's try to schedule the meeting during lunchtime.
She prefers scheduling meetings during lunch hours.

Alternatives:

to schedule a meeting at lunchtime
to arrange a meeting during lunch
to plan a meeting during lunch break
to set up a meeting during lunch hour
to organize a meeting during lunch period

This phrase is a formal way to indicate the act of planning a meeting to occur at the time designated for lunch.

Examples:

I need to schedule a meeting at lunchtime tomorrow.
Let's plan to schedule the meeting at lunch time.
She always schedules her meetings at lunch time.

Alternatives:

scheduling a meeting during lunch
arranging a meeting during lunchtime
planning a meeting at lunch hour
setting up a meeting during lunch break
organizing a meeting at lunch period

Answer 1

scheduling meeting during lunch

This phrase is correct and commonly used in informal contexts.

Answer 2

to schedule a meeting at lunch time

This phrase is correct and more formal in structure.

"scheduling meeting during lunch" vs "to schedule a meeting at lunch time"

scheduling meeting during lunch

to schedule a meeting at lunch time

Related Comparisons