"having considered all" vs "having considered all of"

Question

"having considered all" vs "having considered all of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Having considered all' is more concise and can be used when the following information is clear without the preposition 'of'. 'Having considered all of' is more common and provides a clearer connection between the action and the object being considered.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase can be used when the object being considered is evident from the context. It is a more concise form of the phrase.

Examples:

Having considered all options, she decided to take a break.

Alternatives:

Having considered everything

This phrase is more commonly used to clearly indicate the object being considered. It is a slightly more formal and explicit form of the phrase.

Examples:

Having considered all of the evidence, the jury reached a verdict.

Alternatives:

Having considered all the
Having considered every

Answer 1

having considered all

This phrase is correct but less common. It is more concise and can be used when the context makes the object being considered clear.

Answer 2

having considered all of

This phrase is correct and more commonly used. It provides a clearer connection between the action of considering and the object being considered.

"having considered all" vs "having considered all of"

having considered all

having considered all of

Related Comparisons