"provide for" vs "provide to"

Question

"provide for" vs "provide to"

Both 'provide for' and 'provide to' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Provide for' is used when talking about making provisions or arrangements for someone or something, while 'provide to' is used when indicating the recipient of something being provided.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about making provisions or arrangements for someone or something. It implies ensuring that the needs or requirements of the person or thing are met.

Examples:

The company provides for its employees' health insurance.
The government must provide for the welfare of its citizens.
The will provides for the distribution of assets among the heirs.

Alternatives:

make provisions for
arrange for
ensure for
take care of
look after

This phrase is used when indicating the recipient of something being provided. It implies the action of giving or supplying something to someone.

Examples:

The company provides training to its employees.
The organization provides food to the homeless.
The school provides resources to the students.

Alternatives:

give to
supply to
offer to
furnish to
grant to

Answer 1

provide for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

provide to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"provide for" vs "provide to"

provide for

provide to

Related Comparisons