"which implies that" vs "is temporally independence"

Question

"which implies that" vs "is temporally independence"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "Is temporally independence" seems to be a fragment of a sentence that lacks context, while "which implies that" is a phrase used to introduce a consequence or inference. They are not interchangeable in most contexts.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

Use this phrase to connect a statement or fact with a subsequent conclusion or implication. It helps to show the relationship between the two ideas.

Examples:

She didn't answer my calls, which implies that she might be avoiding me.
The data suggests a decrease in sales, which implies that we need to adjust our marketing strategy.
He missed the meeting, which implies that he might not be interested in the project.
The report highlights several issues, which implies that we need to take immediate action.
The sudden change in weather, which implies that a storm is approaching.

Alternatives:

this suggests that
this indicates that
this means that
this leads to the conclusion that
this results in

This phrase does not make sense on its own. It might be part of a larger sentence where the word 'temporally' is used incorrectly or in an unusual way.

Answer 1

which implies that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a logical consequence or inference.

Answer 2

is temporally independence

This phrase is not a complete or commonly used construction in English. It seems to be missing context or may contain an error.

"which implies that" vs "is temporally independence"

which implies that

is temporally independence

Related Comparisons