"put in place" vs "have put in place"

Question

"put in place" vs "have put in place"

Both "have put in place" and "put in place" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Have put in place" is used when referring to a completed action that took place in the past and is still relevant in the present. On the other hand, "put in place" is used to describe a general action without specifying a particular time frame.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

Use "put in place" when you want to talk about the action of establishing or implementing something without focusing on a specific time frame. It is a more general way of expressing the idea.

Examples:

The company put in place new safety measures.
The government is planning to put in place regulations to protect the environment.
We need to put in place a strategy to address the issue.

Alternatives:

established
implemented
enforced
introduced
enacted

Use "have put in place" when you want to emphasize that an action was completed in the past and is still in effect. It indicates a connection between the past action and the present situation.

Examples:

The company has put in place new safety measures to protect its employees.
The government has put in place regulations to control pollution.
We have put in place a new system to improve efficiency.

Alternatives:

have implemented
have established
have enforced
have introduced
have enacted

Answer 1

put in place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe a general action without specifying a particular time frame.

Answer 2

have put in place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to a completed action in the past that is still relevant in the present.

"put in place" vs "have put in place"

put in place

have put in place

Related Comparisons