"allocated to" vs "allocated for"

Question

"allocated to" vs "allocated for"

Both 'allocated for' and 'allocated to' are correct and commonly used phrases in English. The choice between them depends on the context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used when assigning something to a particular person, group, or entity. It indicates the recipient of the allocation.

Examples:

The budget was allocated to different departments.
The tasks were allocated to specific team members.

Alternatives:

assigned to
given to
distributed to
apportioned to
allotted to

This phrase is used when assigning something for a specific purpose or use. It indicates that something has been set aside or designated for a particular reason.

Examples:

Funds were allocated for the new project.
Time was allocated for each task in the schedule.

Alternatives:

designated for
earmarked for
reserved for
set aside for
appropriated for

Answer 1

allocated to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

allocated for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"allocated to" vs "allocated for"

allocated to

allocated for

Related Comparisons