1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"consistent with what we have" vs "pointed out in the theoretical analysis"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. The first phrase refers to highlighting something in a theoretical analysis, while the second phrase indicates agreement with a previous statement or finding.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

consistent with what we have

This phrase is correct and is used to express agreement or alignment with something previously mentioned or known.

This phrase is used to indicate that a statement or finding is in agreement with existing information or data.

Examples:

  • The new data is consistent with what we have observed in previous studies.
  • His explanation is consistent with what we have learned so far.

pointed out in the theoretical analysis

This phrase is correct and commonly used in academic or technical contexts to refer to something highlighted or emphasized in a theoretical analysis.

This phrase is used to draw attention to specific points or findings discussed in a theoretical analysis or academic paper.

Examples:

  • As pointed out in the theoretical analysis, the model's assumptions need to be reevaluated.
  • The flaws in the argument were pointed out in the theoretical analysis.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!