"We should be there" vs "We should be there on"

Question

"We should be there" vs "We should be there on"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'We should be there' is a complete sentence indicating a location or event, while 'We should be there on' is followed by a specific time or date. The addition of 'on' in the second phrase specifies when the action should take place.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is a complete sentence indicating a location or event that someone should attend or reach.

Examples:

We should be there by 3 p.m.
I told them we should be there early.
Do you think we should be there for the meeting?
She said we should be there to support our friend.
He asked if we should be there to help with the setup.

Alternatives:

We should go there.
We need to be there.
We must be there.
We have to be there.
We ought to be there.

This phrase is used when specifying a particular time or date when someone should be at a location or event.

Examples:

We should be there on time.
I think we should be there on Friday.
She mentioned we should be there on the 15th.
He suggested we should be there on the weekend.
Do you know if we should be there on the 1st or the 2nd?

Alternatives:

We should be there by Friday.
We should be there at 3 p.m.
We should be there in the morning.
We should be there next week.
We should be there for the event.

Answer 1

We should be there

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

We should be there on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"We should be there" vs "We should be there on"

We should be there

We should be there on

Related Comparisons