"send it for the attention of" vs "send it to the attention of"

Question

"send it for the attention of" vs "send it to the attention of"

Both phrases are correct, but 'send it to the attention of' is more commonly used in English. They both convey the same meaning of directing something to a specific person or department.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase also indicates directing something to a specific person or department, but it is less common in usage.

Examples:

Please send the package for the attention of the manager.
I will send the report for the attention of the HR department.
The letter was sent for the attention of the CEO.
The email was sent for the attention of John Smith.
Could you send the invoice for the attention of accounting?

Alternatives:

send it to the attention of
address it to
direct it to
deliver it to
forward it to

This phrase is used to specify who should receive a particular item or communication. It is commonly used in formal written communication.

Examples:

Please send the package to the attention of the manager.
I will send the report to the attention of the HR department.
The letter was sent to the attention of the CEO.
The email was sent to the attention of John Smith.
Could you send the invoice to the attention of accounting?

Alternatives:

address it to
direct it to
deliver it to
forward it to
route it to

Answer 1

send it for the attention of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English compared to 'send it to the attention of'.

Answer 2

send it to the attention of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate directing something to a specific person or department.

"send it for the attention of" vs "send it to the attention of"

send it for the attention of

send it to the attention of

Related Comparisons