"after the course of" vs "after the course of 10 years"

Question

"after the course of" vs "after the course of 10 years"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'After the course of' is a general expression used to indicate the passage of time without specifying a duration, while 'after the course of 10 years' is more specific and indicates a period of 10 years. The choice between them depends on the level of detail you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the passage of time without specifying a specific duration. It is a general expression that can be used in various contexts.

Alternatives:

after a period of
following the passage of
subsequent to

This phrase is used when you want to specify a particular duration of time, in this case, 10 years. It adds a level of detail to the statement.

Alternatives:

after a decade
following a period of 10 years
subsequent to 10 years passing

Answer 1

after the course of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the passage of time without specifying a duration.

Answer 2

after the course of 10 years

This phrase is also correct and provides a specific duration of 10 years. It is used when you want to be more precise about the time frame.

"after the course of" vs "after the course of 10 years"

after the course of

after the course of 10 years

Related Comparisons