"it has no" vs "it does not have"

Question

"it has no" vs "it does not have"

Both "it has no" and "it does not have" are correct phrases in English. They can be used interchangeably depending on the context and personal preference. Both forms are commonly used and understood by native speakers.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of something possessed by a subject. It is a concise way to express the lack of possession.

Examples:

It has no connection to the previous incident.
The old house has no heating system.
The book has no illustrations.
The restaurant has no vegetarian options.
The car has no air conditioning.

Alternatives:

it lacks
it is without
it is missing
it doesn't have
it is devoid of

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of possession by a subject. It is a more formal or explicit way to express the lack of something.

Examples:

It does not have any relevance to the discussion.
The company does not have a backup plan.
The museum does not have an entrance fee.
The phone does not have a headphone jack.
The garden does not have any flowers.

Alternatives:

it lacks
it is without
it is missing
it has no
it is devoid of

Answer 1

it has no

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

it does not have

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"it has no" vs "it does not have"

it has no

it does not have

Related Comparisons